Benchmarks That Don't Lie to You
Teams love publishing graphs. Teams are less enthusiastic about publishing setup details, warm-cache behavior, and failure modes. Curious.
If a benchmark is going to influence architecture decisions, it needs to be legible enough that someone slightly skeptical can reproduce it without summoning a shaman.
Good Benchmark Hygiene
We prefer benchmarks that make a few things painfully obvious:
- dataset shape
- concurrency model
- cache assumptions
- error handling path
- exact environment
If any of those are vague, the benchmark is already trying on a fake mustache.
What the Reader Actually Needs
Readers usually want to know three things:
- Will this hold under my workload?
- What tradeoff bought the speedup?
- Where does it break?
Answer those directly and the benchmark becomes useful instead of decorative.